Clinical Value Analysis of Immediate Implantation Combined with Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation and Guided Bone Regeneration with Simultaneous Implant Repair in Athletes and Fitness Players

Authors

  • Xin Lei Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong Province, China
  • Xiaohu Xu Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong Province, China
  • Cuifen Liang Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong Province, China
  • Ying Huang Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong Province, China
  • Yuqiong Liu Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong Province, China
  • Yuemei Pan Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen 518110, Guangdong Province, China

Keywords:

Immediate implantation; Maxillary sinus floor elevation; Guided bone tissue regeneration; Simultaneous planting and restoration technology

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of immediate implantation combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation and guided bone regeneration with simultaneous implant repair, specifically focusing on athletes and fitness players experiencing dentition loss. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery due to dentition loss at our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. These patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment received: 30 patients underwent guided bone regeneration with simultaneous implant repair (control group), while the other 30 received immediate implantation combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation (observation group). We compared surgical indicators including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of pain and swelling, and implant success rates. Additionally, the incidence of complications such as maxillary mucosal rupture, epistaxis, and the average increase in maxillary sinus floor bone, change in implant stability quotient, and patient satisfaction with the repair were evaluated. Results: The observation group, which underwent immediate implantation and maxillary sinus floor elevation, showed significantly reduced operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and shorter durations of pain and swelling compared to the control group, indicating statistical significance (P < 0.05). The implant success rate was 100% in the observation group versus 93.33% in the control group, although this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05), nor in the average increase of maxillary sinus floor bone (P > 0.05). However, the implant stability quotient was notably higher in the observation group, but with no significant statistical difference (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction did not significantly differ between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both immediate implantation combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation and guided bone regeneration with simultaneous implant repair demonstrate significant clinical efficacy for treating dentition loss, with the former showing greater advantages in terms of surgical indicators and implant stability, which is crucial for athletes and fitness players. This study underscores the importance of selecting the most appropriate surgical intervention based on the specific needs and conditions of patients, particularly those engaged in high-level physical activities, to ensure optimal outcomes and satisfaction.

Published

2024-02-07