ANÁLISIS DE LAS FASES DEL RESCATE ACUÁTICO COMO ELEMENTO DISCRIMINATIVO DEL RENDIMIENTO

Authors

  • Barcala-Furelos, R REMOSS Research Group. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte. Universidade de Vigo (Spain) .CLINURSID, Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radiología, Salud Pública, Enfermería y Medicina, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Simulation and Intensive Care Unit of Santiago (SICRUS), Health Research Institute de Santiago, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela-CHUS (Spain).
  • Alonso-Calvete, A REMOSS Research Group. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte. Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
  • Lorenzo-Martínez, M. REMOSS Research Group. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte. Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
  • Gómez-Reyes, S REMOSS Research Group. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte. Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
  • Padrón-Cabo, A Departamento de Educación Física y Ciencias del Deporte. Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte y Educación Física, Universidad de A Coruña (Spain)
  • Rey, E REMOSS Research Group. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte. Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
  • y Abelairas-Gómez, C CLINURSID, Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radiología, Salud Pública, Enfermería y Medicina, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Spain), Simulation and Intensive Care Unit of Santiago (SICRUS), Health Research Institute de Santiago, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela-CHUS (Spain). Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Spain)

Keywords:

lifeguard; drowning; emergency medicine.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the different phases of a water rescue, their influence in the whole lifesaving and if lifeguards could be differentiated according to their abilities during a water rescue. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out to analyze the different phases and lifeguards abilities of a simulated water rescue of 100 m. Thirty-four professional lifeguards performed the test and the time was recorded for the first phase (swimming to the victim), the second phase (towing back the victim) and the third phase (extracting the victim). A discriminant analysis was conducted in order to classify lifeguards in two groups (high or medium level of abilities during the water rescue) and the times were compared on each phase. Results: The time during the second and the third phase classify correctly the lifeguards according to their level of abilities. Lifeguards with higher level of abilities performed the water rescue significantly faster, specifically during the second (p < 0.001, ES =1.38, large) and the third phase (p =0.002, ES = 1.09, medium), but no differences were found in the first part of the water rescue (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The time of a simulated water rescue seems to be a good method to classify lifeguards according to their abilities. These findings could allow rescue teams to know the skills of their lifeguards and design strategies in order to decrease risks and enhance lifesaving. 

Author Biography

y Abelairas-Gómez, C, CLINURSID, Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radiología, Salud Pública, Enfermería y Medicina, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Spain), Simulation and Intensive Care Unit of Santiago (SICRUS), Health Research Institute de Santiago, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela-CHUS (Spain). Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Spain)

 

 

Downloads

Published

2023-12-17