Authors
-
Kuo Zhao
Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China; Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Ning Zhao
Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Xianming Liu
Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China; Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Lina Tong
Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Zichen Xu
Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Mingyou Gao
Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China; Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Xiaojing Xie
Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China; Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Limeng Zhang
Department of Medical Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China; Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Zhanbo Wu
Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
-
Xin Li
Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Precancerous lesions; Copy number; Gene S100A10, Gene SRD
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the copy number variations of the S100A10 gene on 1q21.3 and the SRD gene on 1p36.3 across different stages of breast disease progression—from hyperplasia to invasive carcinoma—with a focus on implications for early diagnosis in athletes. Methods: Wax block specimens from 60 patients diagnosed with breast hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma were analyzed. The copy numbers of the S100A10 and SRD genes in each breast tissue type were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Statistical significance was determined through a nonparametric rank test of independent samples, with a P-value <0.05 considered significant. Results: The S100A10 gene displayed a progressive increase in copy number from breast hyperplasia (mean: 1.95) to carcinoma in situ (mean: 2.51) and invasive carcinoma (mean: 3.29), with statistically significant differences between each group. Conversely, the SRD gene showed a stable copy number in hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ but a significant decrease in invasive carcinoma (mean: 1.76). The deletion of the SRD gene was predominantly observed in invasive breast cancer cases. Conclusion: Monitoring the copy number changes of the S100A10 and SRD genes could enhance the diagnostic precision for breast disease progression, particularly in athletes who require timely intervention to maintain optimal health and performance levels. This combined genetic screening could serve as a valuable tool in the proactive health management strategies for athlete populations, aiding in early detection and potentially improving outcomes in breast-related diseases.